November 14, 2023
How to Avoid Joint Employer Liability when you Franchise Your Business Model

How to Avoid Joint Employer Liability when you Franchise Your Business Model


Franchising offers entrepreneurs a unique avenue to expand their business while minimizing certain risks associated with growth. However, the issue of joint employer liability has become a significant concern for franchisors. This comprehensive guide explores the concept of joint employer liability, examines the legal landscape, and provides strategies for franchisors to minimize their risk and maintain the distinct separation between themselves and their franchisees.


Section 1: Understanding Joint Employer Liability

Joint employer liability arises when two or more entities share control over the terms and conditions of employment for a group of employees. In the context of franchising, the question of whether a franchisor can be deemed a joint employer with its franchisees has become a complex legal issue. The legal landscape surrounding joint employer liability has evolved, impacting the responsibilities and potential liabilities of franchisors.


1.1 Evolution of Joint Employer Liability

Over the years, legal interpretations of joint employer liability have shifted, creating uncertainty for franchisors. Recent court decisions and regulatory developments have broadened the scope of entities that could be considered joint employers, raising concerns within the franchising industry.


1.2 Impact on Franchisors

For franchisors, being deemed a joint employer could have significant consequences, including shared liability for employment-related issues such as wage and hour violations, discrimination claims, and collective bargaining disputes. To navigate these challenges, franchisors must take proactive measures to establish and maintain clear separation from the employment practices of their franchisees.


Section 2: Legal Framework and Regulatory Landscape

To effectively avoid joint employer liability, franchisors must be well-versed in the legal framework and regulatory landscape that governs this complex issue. This section provides an overview of key legal considerations, recent developments, and relevant regulations.


2.1 National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) Standard

The NLRB’s standard for joint employer liability has undergone changes, with the Board adopting a more expansive approach. Under the current standard, indirect control or reserved authority to control essential terms and conditions of employment may trigger joint employer status.


2.2 Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)

The FLSA, which governs minimum wage and overtime pay, plays a crucial role in joint employer liability. The Department of Labor’s interpretations and guidance on the FLSA impact how franchisors structure their relationships with franchisees to avoid shared liability.


2.3 State Laws and Emerging Legislation

In addition to federal laws, state laws and emerging legislation can further complicate the landscape. Franchisors must stay informed about changes at both the federal and state levels, as some states have adopted their own standards for joint employer liability.


Section 3: Establishing Clear Franchise Agreements

One of the primary ways franchisors can mitigate the risk of joint employer liability is by establishing clear and comprehensive franchise agreements. These legal documents serve as the foundation for the franchisor-franchisee relationship, defining roles, responsibilities, and the level of control exerted by each party.


3.1 Defining Franchisee Independence 

Franchise agreements should explicitly outline the independence of franchisees as separate business entities. Language should emphasize that franchisees operate as independent contractors responsible for their employees, including hiring, firing, and setting employment policies.


3.2 Avoiding Direct Control Language 

To minimize the risk of being deemed a joint employer, franchisors should carefully craft their franchise agreements to avoid language that suggests direct control over employment matters. The agreement should emphasize guidance and brand standards without infringing on the franchisee’s autonomy in employment decisions.


3.3 Including Disclaimers 

Incorporating disclaimers in franchise agreements can further reinforce the separation between the franchisor and franchisee in employment matters. These disclaimers explicitly state that the franchisor does not assume responsibility for the franchisee’s employees and employment practices.


Section 4: Restricting Involvement in Day-to-Day Operations

Franchisors can strengthen their position against joint employer liability by limiting their involvement in the day-to-day operations of franchisee-owned businesses. This involves striking a balance between providing necessary support and maintaining the franchisee’s autonomy.


4.1 Establishing Operational Guidelines 

Franchisors should establish clear operational guidelines that focus on brand standards, quality control, and customer experience, without delving into specific employment practices. This approach allows franchisors to exert control over the brand while leaving employment decisions to the franchisee.


4.2 Providing Training Without Control 

Training programs should focus on imparting essential skills related to the brand and business operations without exercising control over employment-related aspects. The goal is to enhance the franchisee’s capabilities while avoiding any perception of direct influence on employment matters.


4.3 Avoiding Direct Employee Supervision

Franchisors should refrain from directly supervising or overseeing franchisee employees. While providing general guidance and standards, franchisors should avoid any involvement that could be construed as exerting control over the employment relationship.


Section 5: Implementing System-Wide Standards

Maintaining system-wide standards is a key aspect of franchising, ensuring consistency across all franchise locations. However, franchisors must strike a delicate balance to avoid crossing the line into joint employer territory.


5.1 Brand Standards vs. Employment Practices

Franchisors can maintain system-wide standards related to brand image, product quality, and customer experience without extending control over employment practices. Clear differentiation between brand standards and employment matters is essential to avoid joint employer liability.


5.2 Quality Control Measures

Quality control measures should focus on aspects directly related to the brand and customer experience. Franchisors can implement guidelines and inspections that safeguard the overall integrity of the brand without infringing on the franchisee’s management of their employees.


5.3 Regular Audits and Compliance Checks

Conducting regular audits and compliance checks helps ensure that franchisees adhere to established standards. However, these processes should primarily focus on the brand and operational aspects, steering clear of direct involvement in employment practices.


Section 6: Providing Guidance Without Control

Franchisors can offer valuable guidance and support to franchisees without compromising the separation required to avoid joint employer liability. This section explores strategies for providing assistance while maintaining a clear distinction between franchisor and franchisee responsibilities.


6.1 Establishing Advisory Councils

Advisory councils can serve as forums for sharing best practices, industry trends, and operational insights without encroaching on employment decisions. These councils provide a platform for collaboration while respecting the independence of individual franchisees.


6.2 Offering Optional Resources and Training

Franchisors can offer optional resources and training programs that franchisees can choose to utilize based on their specific needs. This approach empowers franchisees to access support while reinforcing their autonomy in making business and employment-related decisions.


6.3 Emphasizing Best Practices 

Franchisors can emphasize best practices without mandating specific employment policies. Providing recommendations and examples of successful approaches allows franchisees to adopt practices that align with their business model while avoiding the imposition of standardized employment practices.


Section 7: Continuous Legal Monitoring and Compliance

Given the evolving nature of joint employer liability, franchisors must engage in continuous legal monitoring and compliance efforts. Staying informed about changes in regulations, court decisions, and industry trends is essential to adapting and implementing proactive measures.


7.1 Legal Counsel and Compliance Teams 

Engaging legal counsel well-versed in franchise law and employment regulations is crucial. Legal professionals can provide ongoing advice, conduct compliance reviews, and assist in adapting franchise agreements to align with evolving legal standards.


7.2 Regular Training for Franchise Support Teams 

Franchise support teams must be well-trained in employment-related matters to avoid unintentional actions that could be interpreted as joint employer involvement. Regular training sessions can enhance awareness and ensure compliance with legal standards.


7.3 Proactive Response to Legal Changes

Franchisors should adopt a proactive approach to legal changes by promptly updating franchise agreements and operational guidelines. This may involve seeking legal opinions on the potential impact of changes in the legal landscape on the franchisor-franchisee relationship.


Section 8: Case Studies and Precedents

Examining relevant case studies and legal precedents provides valuable insights into how courts have interpreted joint employer liability in the franchising context. Understanding these cases can guide franchisors in structuring their relationships to minimize the risk of joint employer status.


8.1 Key Legal Precedents

Analyzing key legal precedents, such as the Browning-Ferris Industries case and subsequent rulings, sheds light on factors that courts consider when determining joint employer status. These cases underscore the importance of maintaining a clear separation between franchisors and franchisees.


8.2 Industry-Specific Cases

Industry-specific cases offer nuanced insights into how courts assess joint employer liability within particular sectors. Franchisors should be aware of cases relevant to their industry to tailor their practices and agreements accordingly.


Section 9: Evolving Strategies in Response to Industry Changes

The franchising landscape is dynamic, and strategies to avoid joint employer liability must evolve in response to industry changes. This section explores how franchisors can adapt their approaches based on emerging trends, technological advancements, and shifts in consumer expectations.


9.1 Technology and Automation 

Technological advancements and automation can impact the franchisor-franchisee relationship. Franchisors should leverage technology to enhance operational efficiency while carefully considering how automation may influence employment dynamics.


9.2 Consumer Preferences and Labor Practices 

Changes in consumer preferences and labor practices can have cascading effects on the franchising industry. Franchisors should stay attuned to shifts in consumer expectations and labor market dynamics to anticipate potential implications for joint employer liability.


Section 10: Building Strong Relationships with Franchisees

The foundation of a successful franchise system lies in strong relationships between franchisors and franchisees. Building and maintaining these relationships fosters trust, cooperation, and a shared commitment to the success of the overall franchise system.


10.1 Open Communication Channels 

Establishing open communication channels is essential. Regular dialogue between franchisors and franchisees promotes a collaborative environment where concerns can be addressed, and expectations can be aligned without crossing the boundaries that may lead to joint employer liability.


10.2 Franchisee Associations and Collaboration 

Encouraging the formation of franchisee associations allows franchisees to collectively address common concerns. Franchisors can collaborate with these associations to address industry challenges while maintaining the autonomy of individual franchisees.


In conclusion, navigating joint employer liability in franchising requires a multifaceted approach that combines legal awareness, operational strategies, and a commitment to fostering strong relationships. Franchisors must continuously adapt to legal changes, industry trends, and technological advancements while prioritizing the independence of franchisees in employment matters. By implementing proactive measures, staying informed, and building collaborative relationships, franchisors can successfully mitigate the risk of joint employer liability and uphold the integrity of the franchising model.


For more information on the process of franchising your business or how to franchise your business, contact Franchise Marketing Systems / FMS Franchise: 

Share on social media: